Quality manufacturing processes are crucial to producing reliable
power supplies. The following guidelines have been developed to
assist in this endeavor.
RECEIVING INSPECTION CONTROL ON COMPONENTS
The objective of the receiving/inspection process is to prevent
detrimental impact to both schedule and cost resulting from
receiving and installing defective components. It is recommended
that the tests and inspections listed in the Component Screening
and/or Special Controls section of this document be performed on a
100% or sample basis as indicated.
Testing of components includes but is not limited to the
following nondestructive and destructive tests and
inspections.
(1) Nondestructive Tests
a. Electrical b. Hermeticity c. X-ray d. PIND e.
Component marking permanency.
(2) Destructive Tests
a. De-lid/de-pot b. Pull test on bonds, both internal and
external c. Plating adhesion d. Lead solderability e.
Microscopic examination (preferably with a scanning electron
microscope).
Each lot that does not successfully pass all of the tests should
be returned to the component manufacturer with notification as to
the cause for rejection. Concurrence with and positive corrective
action relative to the deficiency should be requested/required in
writing by a specific date. The test data and manufacturer's
response need to be recorded as component performance
history.
COMPONENT MOUNTING
It is recommended that components be inserted via automatic or
semi-automatic component insertion equipment whenever possible. This
ultimately prevents components from being inserted backwards or in
the wrong location. If such equipment is used, the sequence and
placement of components must be validated by "first piece"
inspection. When using automatic polarity checking with this
equipment, the accidental application of high-voltage pulses must be
prevented.
Manufacturing personnel should verify their own work prior to
submitting an assembly to inspection.
Components that are sensitive to ESD or voltage transients should
be protected via appropriate containers and workstation
grounding.
SOLDER JOINTS AND SOLDER PROCESSES
A key precondition to a good solder joint is pre-tinning of all
leads/pins prior to assembly. For maximum reliability and
consistency, the solder joints should be made via automated
processes:
(1) Wave solder for pin-in-hole connections
(2) Semi-automatic for surface mounting (e.g.,
flatpacks).
All solder joints should be inspectable; this requires that
blind-hole solder joints be restricted in the design.
For pin-in-hole solder joints, the solder should penetrate
through the barrel of a PTH. This applies also to wires,
transformers, connectors, etc., and requires that the solder joint
be made from the side of the PWB/MIB opposite that on which the
component is located.
Make all wire connections to a PWB/MIB only on the component side
of the PWB/MIB to simplify assembly, rework and repair, and to
minimize handling damage.
Flux must not become entrapped due to a blockage at one end of
the PTH; this has a high potential for causing a poor solder joint
which will fail at a later time.
Cavities are a natural place for moisture, foreign material, or
solder to get trapped and/or wedged, resulting in an electrical
short to the frame. This can be prevented by either:
(1) Designing the cavity out,
(2) Making the cavity sufficiently large so as to reduce the risk
of entrapment,
(3) Coating the area to prevent the short from occurring,
or
(4) A combination of the latter two techniques.
ASSEMBLY LEVEL
Loose Particles
Loose particles can cause shorts. Prevent them from getting into
the power supply during the assembly cycle. The mechanical design
can reduce the problem of loose particles by eliminating convenient
places (e.g., cavities) into which they may settle. The
manufacturing processes should provide facilities (e.g., Plexiglass
shields on lead-clipping benches) to prevent the particles from
getting into an assembly. As a final assembly procedure, the power
supply as well as the individual assemblies should be turned upside
down and shaken in order to get rid of any particles.
Susceptibility to Solvents
There are several cleaning solutions and/or processes that can
cause an electrical failure at a later time. One mechanism is
chloride contamination that evolves into an electrical short; e.g.,
chemical reaction with the aluminum foil inside an aluminum
electrolytic capacitor. (Refer to paragraph 4.2 for a method of
preventing this interaction.) "Circuit coolant" used to test
portions of a circuit at low temperature can cause damage from
electrostatic charge and chemical contamination. Semiconductor
isolating washers may not all have the same resistance to chemical
solvents. Solvents such as methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) should be
avoided.
Wire Routing
Wires are susceptible to being broken and/or pinched, especially
during or after a rework/repair operation. To avoid such problems,
as well as to prevent crosstalk, care must be taken in the decisions
to use a wire (or harness) and its placement and routing.
Handling Damage The reliability obtained with good design and
manufacturing processes can be degraded by poorly designed fixtures
and containers, and damage caused by inadequately trained personnel.
Consideration of these factors can reduce handling damage
substantially during assembly and rework/repair operations.
Power Device Mounting
The potential reliability gain by eliminating the use of thermal
grease and using the thermal conductive plastic impregnated
fiberglass isolators can be destroyed if proper torquing
requirements are not precisely followed. Too much pressure can
rupture the isolator, thus allowing an electrical short to develop
between the "hot-case" device and heat sink, while too little
pressure will result in poor thermal conductivity and, hence, a
higher junction temperature. Great care must be taken in selection
and installation of shoulder washers to obtain proper
pressure.
Manufacturer's tables can be used as a guide to establishing
torquing requirements; however, caution should be exercised because
of the wide variation in pressure obtained as a function of the
mechanical resistance between the screw head, or nut and the washer
or other bearing surface. Experimental results may be required to
obtain the optimum torque required.
INSPECTION
Manufacturing personnel should verify their own work prior to
submitting an assembly to inspection. Inspection and assembly
personnel should have as many visual aids as possible. Examples of
effective visual aids are blown-up color photographs of the
completed work at each stage of assembly for each assembly and next
higher level of assembly.
REWORK
Workmanship errors found during the inspection process should be
corrected by the initial-build
personnel. |